Compelled, apparently, by a single urge, the foreign correspondents had left their bar and were floating in a long shoal towards the centre table already prepared for them. A very large man, catching sight of de Lisle, pulled a long strand of black hair over his right eye, and extended his arm in a Nazi greeting. De Lisle lifted his glass in reply.
‘That’s Sam Allerton,’ he explained in an aside. ‘He really is rather a pig. Where was I? Artificial divisions. Yes. They absolutely bedevil us here. Always the same: in a grey world we reach frantically for absolutes. Anti-French, pro-French, Communist, anti-Communist. Sheer nonsense, but we do it time and again. That’s why we’re so wrong about Karfeld. So dreadfully wrong. We argue about definitions when we should be arguing about facts. Bonn will go to the gallows arguing about the width of the rope that hangs us. I don’t know how you define Karfeld; who does? The German Poujade? The middle-class revolution? If that’s what he is then we are ruined, I agree, because in Germany they’re all middle class. Like America: reluctantly equal. They don’t want to be equal, who does? They just are. Uniblood.’
The waiter had brought the wine, and de Lisle pressed Turner to taste it. ‘I’m sure your palate is fresher than mine.’ Turner declined, so he sampled it himself, elaborately. ‘How very clever,’ he said appreciatively to the waiter. ‘How good.
‘All the smart definitions apply to him, every one, of course they do; they apply to anyone. Just like psychiatry: presume the symptoms and you can always find a name for them. He’s isolationist, chauvinist, pacifist, revanchist. And he wants a trade alliance with Russia. He’s progressive, which appeals to the German old, he’s reactionary, which appeals to the German young. The young are so puritanical here. They want to be cleansed of prosperity; they want bows and arrows and Barbarossa.’ He pointed wearily towards the Seven Hills. ‘They want all that in modern dress. No wonder the old are hedonistic. But the young-‘ He broke off. ‘The young,’ he said, with deep distaste, ‘have discovered the cruellest of all truths: that the most effective way of punishing their parents is to imitate them. Karfeld is the students’ adopted grown-up… I’m sorry. This is my hobby-horse. Do tell me to shut up.’
Turner appeared not to have heard. He was staring at the policemen who stood at intervals along the footpath. One of them had found a dinghy tethered under the bank, and he was playing with the sheet, swinging it round and round like a skipping rope.
‘They keep asking us in London: who are his supporters? Where does he get his money from? Define, define. What am I to tell them? “The man in the street,” I wrote once, “traditionally the most elusive social class.” They adore that kind of answer until it reaches Research Department. “The disenchanted,” I said, “the orphans of a dead democracy, the casualties of coalition government.” Socialists who think they’ve been sold out to conservatism, anti-Socialists who think they’ve been sold out to the reds. People who are just too intelligent to vote at all. Karfeld is the one hat that covers all their heads. How do you define a mood? God, they are obtuse. We get no instructions any more: just questions. I told them: “Surely you have the same kind of thing in England? It’s all the rage everywhere else.” And after all, no one suspected a world plot in Paris: why look for it here? Mood… ignorance… boredom.’ He leaned across the table. ‘Have you ever voted? I’m sure you have. What’s it like? Did you feel altered? Was it like Mass? Did you walk away ignoring everybody?’ De Lisle ate another oyster. ‘I think London has been bombed. Is that the answer? And you’re just a blind to cheer us up. Perhaps only Bonn is left. What a frightful thought. A world in exile. That’s what we are though. Inhabited by exiles, too.’
‘Why does Karfeld hate the British?’ Turner asked. His mind was far away.
‘That, I confess, is one of life’s unsolved mysteries. We’ve all tried our hand at it in Chancery. We’ve talked about it, read about it, argued about it. No one has the answer.’ He shrugged. ‘Who believes in motive these days, least of all in a politician? We did try to define that. Something we once did to him, perhaps. Something he once did to us. It’s the childhood impressions that last the longest they say. Are you married, by the way?’