though he could no monage the walkun’ yet but went around on all fours, happy an’ contentedlike
an’ makun’ no trouble oz long oz he was fed promptly, which was onusual often. I was
hangun’ the wash on the line ot the time when out he comes, on all fours, hus bug head waggun’
tull an’ fro an’ blunkun’ un the sun. An’ then, suddent, he talked. I was thot took a-back I near
died o’ fright, an’ fine I knew ut then, the shakun’ o’ Doctor Hall’s head. Talked? Never a bairn
on Island McGill talked so loud an’ tull such purpose. There was no mustakun’ ut. I stood there
all tremblun’ an’ shakun’. Little Sammy was brayun’. I tell you, sir, he was brayun’ like an ass –
just like thot, – loud an’ long an’ cheerful tull ut seemed hus lungs ud crack.
“He was a eediot – a great, awful, monster eediot. Ut was after he talked thot Doctor Hall told
Margaret, but she would no believe. Ut would all come right, she said. Ut was growun’ too fast
for aught else. Guv ut time, said she, an’ we would see. But old Tom Henan knew, an’ he never
held up hus head again. He could no abide the thung, an’ would no brung humsel’ tull touch ut,
though I om no denyun’ he was fair fascinated by ut. Mony the time, I see hum watchun’ of ut
around a corner, lookun’ ot ut tull hus eyes fair bulged wuth the horror; an’ when ut brayed old
Tom ud stuck hus fungers tull hus ears an’ look thot miserable I could a-puttied hum.
“An’ bray ut could! Ut was the only thung ut could do besides eat an’ grow. Whenever ut was
hungry ut brayed, an’ there was no stoppun’ ut save wuth food. An’ always of a marnun’, when
first ut crawled tull the kutchen-door an’ blunked out ot the sun, ut brayed. An’ ut was brayun’
that brought about uts end.
“I mind me well. Ut was three years old an’ oz bug oz a led o’ ten. Old Tom hed been goun’
from bed tull worse, ploughun’ up an’ down the fields an’ talkun’ an’ mutterun’ tull humself. On
the marnun’ o’ the day I mind me, he was suttun’ on the bench outside the kutchen, a-futtun’ the
handle tull a puck-axe. Unbeknown, the monster eediot crawled tull the door an’ brayed after hus
fashion ot the sun. I see old Tom start up an’ look. An’ there was the monster eediot, waggun’
uts bug head an’ blunkun’ an’ brayun’ like the great bug ass ut was. Ut was too much for Tom.
Somethun’ went wrong wuth hum suddent-like. He jumped tull hus feet an’ fetched the puckhandle
down on the monster eediot’s head. An’ he hut ut again an’ again like ut was a mod dog
an’ hum afeard o’ ut. An’ he went straight tull the stable an’ hung humsel’ tull a rafter. An’ I was
no for stoppun’ on after such-like, an’ I went tull stay along wuth me suster thot was married tull
John Martin an’ comfortable-off.”
I sat on the bench by the kitchen door and regarded Margaret Henan, while with her callous
thumb she pressed down the live fire of her pipe and gazed out across the twilight-sombred
fields. It was the very bench Tom Henan had sat upon that last sanguinary day of life. And
Margaret sat in the doorway where the monster, blinking at the sun, had so often wagged its head
and brayed. We had been talking for an hour, she with that slow certitude of eternity that so
befitted her; and, for the life of me, I could lay no finger on the motives that ran through the
tangled warp and woof of her. Was she a martyr to Truth? Did she have it in her to worship at so
abstract a shrine? Had she conceived Abstract Truth to be the one high goal of human endeavour
on that day of long ago when she named her first-born Samuel? Or was hers the stubborn
obstinacy of the ox? the fixity of purpose of the balky horse? the stolidity of the self-willed
peasant-mind? Was it whim or fancy? – the one streak of lunacy in what was otherwise an
SAMUEL
14
eminently rational mind? Or, reverting, was hers the spirit of a Bruno? Was she convinced of the
intellectual rightness of the stand she had taken? Was hers a steady, enlightened opposition to
superstition? or – and a subtler thought – was she mastered by some vaster, profounder
superstition, a fetish-worship of which the Alpha and the Omega was the cryptic Samuel?
“Wull ye be tellun’ me,” she said, “thot uf the second Samuel hod been named Larry thot he
would no hov fell un the hot watter an’ drownded? Atween you an’ me, sir, an’ ye are
untellugent-lookun’ tull the eye, would the name hov made ut onyways dufferent? Would the
washun’ no be done thot day uf he hod been Larry or Michael? Would hot watter no be hot, an’
would hot watter no burn uf he hod hod ony other name but Samuel?”
I acknowledged the justice of her contention, and she went on.
“Do a wee but of a name change the plans o’ God? Do the world run by hut or muss, an’ be God
a weak, shully-shallyun’ creature thot ud alter the fate an’ destiny o’ thungs because the worm
Margaret Henan seen fut tull name her bairn Samuel? There be my son Jamie. He wull no sign a
Rooshan-Funn un hus crew because o’ believun’ thot Rooshan-Funns do be monajun’ the wunds
an’ hov the makun’ o’ bod weather. Wull you be thunkun’ so? Wull you be thunkun’ thot God
thot makes the wunds tull blow wull bend Hus head from on high tull lussen tull the word o’ a
greasy Rooshan-Funn un some dirty shup’s fo’c’sle?”
I said no, certainly not; but she was not to be set aside from pressing home the point of her
argument.
“Then wull you be thunkun’ thot God thot directs the stars un their courses, an’ tull whose
mighty foot the world uz but a footstool, wull you be thunkun’ thot He wull take a spite again’
Margaret Henan an’ send a bug wave off the Cape tull wash her son un tull eternity, all because
she was for namun’ hum Samuel?”
“But why Samuel?” I asked.
“An’ thot I dinna know. I wantud ut so.”
“But why did you want it so?”
“An’ uz ut me thot would be answerun’ a such-like question? Be there ony mon luvun’ or dead
thot can answer? Who can tell the why o’ like? My Jamie was fair daft on buttermilk, he would
drunk ut tull, oz he said humself, hus back teeth was awash. But my Tumothy could no abide
buttermilk. I like tull lussen tull the thunder growlun’ an’ roarun’, an’ rampajun’. My Katie could
no abide the noise of ut, but must scream an’ flutter an’ go runnun’ for the mudmost o’ a featherbed.
Never yet hov I heard the answer tull the why o’ like, God alone hoz thot answer. You an’
me be mortal an’ we canna know. Enough for us tull know what we like an’ what we duslike. I
like – thot uz the first word an’ the last. An’ behind thot like no men can go an’ find the why o’
ut. I like Samuel, an’ I like ut well. Ut uz a sweet name, an’ there be a rollun’ wonder un the
sound o’ ut thot passes onderstandun’.”
SAMUEL
15
The twilight deepened, and in the silence I gazed upon that splendid dome of a forehead which
time could not mar, at the width between the eyes, and at the eyes themselves – clear, outlooking,
and wide-seeing. She rose to her feet with an air of dismissing me, saying –
“Ut wull be a dark walk home, an’ there wull be more thon a sprunkle o’ wet un the sky.”
“Have you any regrets, Margaret Henan?” I asked, suddenly and without forethought.
She studied me a moment.
“Aye, thot I no ha’ borne another son.”
“And you would . . .?” I faltered.
“Aye, thot I would,” she answered. “Ut would ha’ been hus name.”
I went down the dark road between the hawthorn hedges puzzling over the why of like, repeating
Samuel to myself and aloud and listening to the rolling wonder in its sound that had charmed her
soul and led her life in tragic places. Samuel! There was a rolling wonder in the sound. Aye,
there was!
AN ODYSSEY OF THE NORTH
1
An Odyssey of the North
By Jack London
AN ODYSSEY OF THE NORTH
2
THE SLEDS were singing their eternal lament to the creaking of the harnesses and the
tinkling bells of the leaders; but the men and dogs were tired and made no sound. The trail