‘Yes, milor’, I do. Tell me – in the case of the papers being returned to you anonymously, you would prosecute no further inquiry?’ Lord Alloway stared at him.
‘Do you mean on payment of a sum of money?’ ‘No, milor’, returned unconditionally.’ ‘Of course, the recovery of the plans is the great thing,’ said Lord Alloway slowly. He still looked puzzled and uncomprehending.
‘Then I should seriously recommend you to adopt that course.
Only you, the Admiral and your secretary know of the loss. Only they need know of the restitution. And you may count on me to support you in every way – lay the mystery on my shoulders.
You asked me to restore the papers – I have done so. You know no more.’ He rose and held out his hand. ‘Milor’, I am glad to have met you. I have faith in you – and your devotion to England.
You will guide her destinies with a strong, sure hand.’ ‘M. Poirot – I swear to you that I will do my best. It may be a fauk, or it may be a virtue – but I believe in myself.’ ‘So does every great man. Me, I am the same!’ said Poirot grandiloquently.
The car came round to the door in a few minutes, and Lord Alloway bade us farewell on the steps with renewed cordiality.
‘That is a great man, Hastings,’ said Poirot as we drove off.
‘He has brains, resource, power. He is the strong man that England needs to guide her through these difficult days of reconstruction.’ ‘I’m quite ready to agree with all you say, Poirot – but what about Lady Juliet? Ishe to return the papers straight to Alloway?
What will she think when she finds you have gone off without a word?’ ‘Hastings, I will ask you a little question. Why, when she was talking with me, did she not hand me the plans then and there?’ ‘She hadn’t got them with her.’ ‘Perfectly. How long would it take her to fetch them from her room? Or from any hiding-place in the house? You need not answer. I will tell you. Probably about two minutes and a haiti
Yet she asks for ten minutes. Why? Clearly she has to obtain them from some other person, and to reason or argue with that person before they give them up. Now, what person could that be? Not Mrs Conrad, clearly, but a member of her own family, her husband or son. Which is it likely to be? Leonard Weardale said he went straight to bed. We know that to be untrue. Supposing his mother went to his room and found it empty; supposing she came down filled with a nameless dread – he is no beauty that son of hers[ She does not find him, but later she hears him deny that he ever left his room. She leaps to the conclusion that he is the thief.
Hence her interview with me.
‘But, mon ami, we know sometling that Lady Juliet does not.
We know that her son could not have been in the study, because he was on the stairs, making love to the pretty French maid.
Although she does not know it, Leonard Weardale has an alibi.’ ‘Well, then, who did steal the papers? We seem to have eliminated everybody – Lady Juliet, her son, Mrs Conrad, the French maid ‘ ‘Exactly. Use your little grey cells, my friend. The solution stares you in the face.’ I shook my head blankly.
‘But yes! If you would only persevere! See, then, Fitzroy goes out of the study; he leaves the papers on the desk. A few minutes later Lord Alloway enters the room, goes to the desk, and the papers are gone. Only two things are possible: either Fitzroy did not leave the papers on the desk, but put them in his pocket – and that is not reasonable, because, as Alloway pointed out, he could have taken a tracing at his own convenience any time – or else the papers were still on the desk when Lord Alloway went to it – in which case they went into his pocket.’ ‘Lord Alloway the thief,’ I said, dumbfounded. ‘But why?