Heinlein, Robert A – Expanded Universe

might be a friend or neighbor who was well acquainted with our neighboring culture,

it might be the local Mexican consul. If the expert told you that the background

material of the book was nonsense, you would not give the book shelf room.

The same procedure applies to science fiction. No one can be expected to be

expert in everything. If you do not happen to know what makes a rocket go when there

is no air to push against, you need not necessarily read Willy Ley’s Rockets,

Missiles, and Space Travel-although it is a fine book, a “must” for every library,

desirable for any home. You may instead consult anyone of your acquaintance who does

know about rocket ships-say an Air Force or Artillery officer, a physics teacher, or

almost any fourteen-year-old boy, especially boys who are active in high school

science clubs. If the novel being judged concerns cybernetics, nuclear physics,

genetics, chemistry, relativity, it is necessary only to enlist the appropriate

helper.

You would do the same, would you not, with a novel based on the life of

Simon BolIvar?

Of course, there is the alternate, equivalent method of testing the

authenticity of any book by checking on the author. If the SimOn BolIvar novel was

Page 158

written by a distinguished scholar of South American history, you need concern

yourself only with the literary merit of the book. If a book about space travel is

written by a world-famous astronomer (as in the case of the one who writes under the

pen name of “Philip Latham”), you can put your mind at rest about the correctness of

the science therein. In many cases science-fiction writers have more than adequate

professional background in the sciences they use as background material and their

publishers are careful to let you know this through catalog and dustjacket blurb. I

happen to be personally aware of and can vouch for the scientific training of

Sprague de Camp, George 0. Smith, “John Tame,” John W. Campbell, Jr., “Philip

Latham,” Will Jenkins, Jack Williamson, Isaac Asimov, Arthur C. Clarke, E. E. Smith,

Philip Wylie, Olaf Stapledon, H. G. Wells, Damon Knight, Harry Stine, and “J. J.

Coupling.” This listing refers to qualifications in science only and is necessarily

incomplete, nor do I mean to slight the many fine writers without formal scientific

training who are well read in science and most careful in their research.

But some means of checking on a writer of alleged science fiction is

desirable. Most writers of historical fiction appear to go to quite a lot of trouble

to get the facts of their historical scenes correct, but some people seem to feel

that all that is necessary to write science fiction is an unashamed imagination and

a sprinkling of words like “ray gun,” “rocket tube,” “mutant,” and “space warp.” In

some cases the offense is as blatant as it would be in the case of an author of

alleged historical fiction who founded a book on the premise that SimOn BolIvar was

a Chinese monk! It follows that, in order to spot these literary fakers it is

necessary to know that BolIvar was not a Chinese monk-know something of the sciences

yourself or enlist competent advisers.

AFTERWORD

Writers talking about writing are about as bad as parents boasting about

their children. I have not done much of it; the few times that I have been guilty, I

did not instigate the project, and in almost all cases (all, I think) my arm was

twisted.

I promise to avoid it in the future.

The item above, however, I consider worthy of publication (even though my

arm was twisted) because there really are many librarians who earnestly wish to buy

good science fiction. . . but don’t know how to do it. In this short article I tried

very hard to define clearly and simply how to avoid the perils of Sturgeon’s Law in

buying science fiction.

Part way through you will notice the origin of the last name of the STRANGER

IN A STRANGE LAND.

“It is far, far better to have a bastard in the family than an unemployed

son-in-law.”

-Jubal Harshaw

FOREWORD

Superficially this looks like the same sort of article as PANDORA’S BOX; it

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246

Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *