Martin Eden by Jack London

and women? He found them not among the careless, gross, and stupid

intelligences that answered the call of vision to his narrow room.

He felt a loathing for them such as Circe must have felt for her

swine. When he had dismissed the last one and thought himself

alone, a late-comer entered, unexpected and unsummoned. Martin

watched him and saw the stiff-rim, the square-cut, double-breasted

coat and the swaggering shoulders, of the youthful hoodlum who had

once been he.

“You were like all the rest, young fellow,” Martin sneered. “Your

morality and your knowledge were just the same as theirs. You did

not think and act for yourself. Your opinions, like your clothes,

were ready made; your acts were shaped by popular approval. You

were cock of your gang because others acclaimed you the real thing.

You fought and ruled the gang, not because you liked to, – you know

you really despised it, – but because the other fellows patted you

on the shoulder. You licked Cheese-Face because you wouldn’t give

in, and you wouldn’t give in partly because you were an abysmal

brute and for the rest because you believed what every one about

you believed, that the measure of manhood was the carnivorous

ferocity displayed in injuring and marring fellow-creatures’

anatomies. Why, you whelp, you even won other fellows’ girls away

from them, not because you wanted the girls, but because in the

marrow of those about you, those who set your moral pace, was the

instinct of the wild stallion and the bull-seal. Well, the years

Martin Eden

173

have passed, and what do you think about it now?”

As if in reply, the vision underwent a swift metamorphosis. The

stiff-rim and the square-cut vanished, being replaced by milder

garments; the toughness went out of the face, the hardness out of

the eyes; and, the face, chastened and refined, was irradiated from

an inner life of communion with beauty and knowledge. The

apparition was very like his present self, and, as he regarded it,

he noted the student-lamp by which it was illuminated, and the book

over which it pored. He glanced at the title and read, “The

Science of AEsthetics.” Next, he entered into the apparition,

trimmed the student-lamp, and himself went on reading “The Science

of AEsthetics.”

CHAPTER XXX

On a beautiful fall day, a day of similar Indian summer to that

which had seen their love declared the year before, Martin read his

“Love-cycle” to Ruth. It was in the afternoon, and, as before,

they had ridden out to their favorite knoll in the hills. Now and

again she had interrupted his reading with exclamations of

pleasure, and now, as he laid the last sheet of manuscript with its

fellows, he waited her judgment.

She delayed to speak, and at last she spoke haltingly, hesitating

to frame in words the harshness of her thought.

“I think they are beautiful, very beautiful,” she said; “but you

can’t sell them, can you? You see what I mean,” she said, almost

pleaded. “This writing of yours is not practical. Something is

the matter – maybe it is with the market – that prevents you from

earning a living by it. And please, dear, don’t misunderstand me.

I am flattered, and made proud, and all that – I could not be a

true woman were it otherwise – that you should write these poems to

me. But they do not make our marriage possible. Don’t you see,

Martin? Don’t think me mercenary. It is love, the thought of our

future, with which I am burdened. A whole year has gone by since

we learned we loved each other, and our wedding day is no nearer.

Don’t think me immodest in thus talking about our wedding, for

really I have my heart, all that I am, at stake. Why don’t you try

to get work on a newspaper, if you are so bound up in your writing?

Why not become a reporter? – for a while, at least?”

“It would spoil my style,” was his answer, in a low, monotonous

voice. “You have no idea how I’ve worked for style.”

“But those storiettes,” she argued. “You called them hack-work.

You wrote many of them. Didn’t they spoil your style?”

“No, the cases are different. The storiettes were ground out,

jaded, at the end of a long day of application to style. But a

reporter’s work is all hack from morning till night, is the one

paramount thing of life. And it is a whirlwind life, the life of

Martin Eden

174

the moment, with neither past nor future, and certainly without

thought of any style but reportorial style, and that certainly is

not literature. To become a reporter now, just as my style is

taking form, crystallizing, would be to commit literary suicide.

As it is, every storiette, every word of every storiette, was a

violation of myself, of my self-respect, of my respect for beauty.

I tell you it was sickening. I was guilty of sin. And I was

secretly glad when the markets failed, even if my clothes did go

into pawn. But the joy of writing the ‘Love-cycle’! The creative

joy in its noblest form! That was compensation for everything.”

Martin did not know that Ruth was unsympathetic concerning the

creative joy. She used the phrase – it was on her lips he had

first heard it. She had read about it, studied about it, in the

university in the course of earning her Bachelorship of Arts; but

she was not original, not creative, and all manifestations of

culture on her part were but harpings of the harpings of others.

“May not the editor have been right in his revision of your ‘Sea

Lyrics’?” she questioned. “Remember, an editor must have proved

qualifications or else he would not be an editor.”

“That’s in line with the persistence of the established,” he

rejoined, his heat against the editor-folk getting the better of

him. “What is, is not only right, but is the best possible. The

existence of anything is sufficient vindication of its fitness to

exist – to exist, mark you, as the average person unconsciously

believes, not merely in present conditions, but in all conditions.

It is their ignorance, of course, that makes them believe such rot

– their ignorance, which is nothing more nor less than the

henidical mental process described by Weininger. They think they

think, and such thinkless creatures are the arbiters of the lives

of the few who really think.”

He paused, overcome by the consciousness that he had been talking

over Ruth’s head.

“I’m sure I don’t know who this Weininger is,” she retorted. “And

you are so dreadfully general that I fail to follow you. What I

was speaking of was the qualification of editors – ”

“And I’ll tell you,” he interrupted. “The chief qualification of

ninety-nine per cent of all editors is failure. They have failed

as writers. Don’t think they prefer the drudgery of the desk and

the slavery to their circulation and to the business manager to the

joy of writing. They have tried to write, and they have failed.

And right there is the cursed paradox of it. Every portal to

success in literature is guarded by those watch-dogs, the failures

in literature. The editors, sub-editors, associate editors, most

of them, and the manuscript-readers for the magazines and book-

publishers, most of them, nearly all of them, are men who wanted to

write and who have failed. And yet they, of all creatures under

the sun the most unfit, are the very creatures who decide what

shall and what shall not find its way into print – they, who have

proved themselves not original, who have demonstrated that they

lack the divine fire, sit in judgment upon originality and genius.

And after them come the reviewers, just so many more failures.

Martin Eden

175

Don’t tell me that they have not dreamed the dream and attempted to

write poetry or fiction; for they have, and they have failed. Why,

the average review is more nauseating than cod-liver oil. But you

know my opinion on the reviewers and the alleged critics. There

are great critics, but they are as rare as comets. If I fail as a

writer, I shall have proved for the career of editorship. There’s

bread and butter and jam, at any rate.”

Ruth’s mind was quick, and her disapproval of her lover’s views was

buttressed by the contradiction she found in his contention.

“But, Martin, if that be so, if all the doors are closed as you

have shown so conclusively, how is it possible that any of the

great writers ever arrived?”

“They arrived by achieving the impossible,” he answered. “They did

such blazing, glorious work as to burn to ashes those that opposed

them. They arrived by course of miracle, by winning a thousand-to-

one wager against them. They arrived because they were Carlyle’s

battle-scarred giants who will not be kept down. And that is what

Leave a Reply