Patricia Cornwell – Portrait Of A Killer Jack The Ripper

The U.S. has never had a national standard of death investigation, and we are far from it now. Some cities or states continue to have elected coro­ners who go to the scenes but do not perform the autopsies because they are not forensic pathologists or even physicians. There are offices – such as the one in Los Angeles – in which the chief medical examiner is called a coroner, even though he isn’t elected and is a forensic pathologist.

Then there are states that have medical examiners in some cities and coroners in others. Some locales have neither, and local government be-grudgingly pays a small fee for what I call a “circuit forensic pathologist” to ride in and handle a medico-legal case, usually in an inadequate – if not appalling – location such as a funeral home. The worst facility I re­member was one in Pennsylvania. The autopsy was performed in a hos­pital “morgue” used as a temporary storage room for stillborn infants and amputated body parts.

CHAPTER THIRTEEN

HUE AND CRY

The English system of investigating death can be traced back some eight hundred years to the reign of Richard I, when it was decreed that in every county of His Majesty’s realm, officers would insure the “pleas of the crown.” These men were called “crowners,” a name that eventually evolved into “coroner.”

Coroners were elected by the freeholders of the county and were re­quired to be a knight, assuring they were financially secure, of good standing, and, of course, objective and honest in their collection of rev­enues due to the crown. A sudden death was a potential source of income for the king if there was a finding of wrongdoing in murders and suicides, or even if there was an inappropriate response by the one who discovered the dead body – such as not responding at all and looking the other way.

It is human nature to make a hue and cry when one stumbles upon a dead body, but during the medieval era, not to do so was to risk pun­ishment and financial penalty. When a person died suddenly, the coroner was to be notified immediately. He would respond as quickly as he could and assemble a jury for what would later be called an inquest. It is frightening to consider how many deaths were labeled evil deeds when the truth may have been that the poor soul simply choked on his mut­ton, had a stroke, or dropped dead at a young age from a congenitally bad heart or an aneurysm. Suicides and homicides were sins against God and the King. If a person took his or her own life or someone else did, the coroner and jury determined wrongdoing by the deceased or perpe­trator, and the offender’s entire estate could end up in the crown’s cof­fers. This placed the coroner in a tempting position to perhaps bargain a bit and show a little compassion before riding off with coins jingling in his pockets.

Eventually, the coroner’s power placed him in a seat of judgment and he became an enforcer of the law. Suspects seeking refuge in the church would soon enough find themselves face-to-face with the coroner, who would demand a confession and arrange the seizure of the man’s assets in the name of the crown. Coroners were involved in the gruesome prac­tice of trial by ordeal, requiring a person to prove innocence by show­ing no pain or injury after holding a hand in the fire or enduring other dreadful tortures while the coroner sat nearby and somberly watched. Be­fore the days of medico-legal autopsies and professional police investi­gation, a wife’s tumble down the castle steps might be murder if her husband could not endure terrible tortures and escape unscathed.

Coroners of old were the equivalent of today’s forensic pathologist having no medical training and driving a morgue van to a death scene, glancing at the body, listening to witnesses, finding out how much the dead person is worth, deciding that a sudden death from a bee sting was a homicidal poisoning, testing the wife’s innocence by holding her head under water, and if she didn’t drown after five or ten minutes, conclud­ing she was innocent. If she drowned, wrongdoing was the verdict and the family estate was forfeited to the Queen or the president of the United States, depending on where the death occurred. In the coroner system of days gone by, jurors could be bribed. Coroners could increase their wealth. Innocent people could lose everything they owned or be hanged. It was best not to die suddenly, if possible.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163

Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *