“You should be,” Mordan cut in somewhat acidly, “I supplied full transcript two days ago.”
“I beg your pardon, brother. In those forty-eight hours I have held hearings steadily. The Mississippi Valley matter, you know. It’s rather urgent.”
“I’m sorry,” Mordan apologized. “It’s easy for a layman to forget the demands on a Planner’s time.”
“Never mind. No need for finicky courtesy among ourselves. I scanned the brief and the first sixty pages while we were assembling; that, with such previous knowledge of the case as I had, gives me a rough idea of your problem. But tell me, am I correct in thinking that Hamilton holds nothing exclusively in his chart? You have alternative choices?”
“Yes.”
“You expected to finish with his descendent generation — how many generations would be required, using alternative choices?”
“Three additional generations.”
“That is what I thought, and that is my reason for disagreeing with your argument. The genetic purpose of the sequence is, I think, of greater importance to the race, but a delay of a hundred years, more or less, is not important-not sufficiently important to justify an undertaking as major as a full effort to investigate the question of survival after death.”
“I take it,” put in the Speaker for the Day, “that you wish to be recorded as opposing Brother Mordan’s proposal?”
“No, Hubert, no. You anticipate me-incorrectly. I am supporting his proposition. Notwithstanding the fact that I consider his reasons, though good, to be insufficient, I evaluate the proposal as worthwhile in itself. I think we should support it fully.”
The Member from the Antilles looked up from the book he was reading (not rudeness; everyone present knew that he had parallel mental processes and no one expected him to waste half the use of his time out of politeness) and said, “I think George should amplify his reason.”
“I will. We policy men are like a pilot who is attempting to do a careful job of conning his ship without having any idea of his destination. Hamilton has put his finger on the weak point in our whole culture-he should be a planner himself. Every decision that we make, although it is based on data, is shaped by our personal philosophies. The data is examined in the light of these philosophies. How many of you have an opinion about survival-after-death? I ask for a show of hands. Come now, be honest with yourselves.” Somewhat hesitantly they put their hands up-men and women alike, every one of them. “Now,” the Great Lakes member continued, “the hands of those who are sure that their opinions are correct.”
All of the hands went down, save that of the Member from Patagonia. “Bravo!” Rembert of the Lakes called out. “I should have guessed that you would be sure.”
She took the cigar out of her mouth, said rather sharply, “Any fool knows that one,” and went back to her needlework. She was over a hundred years old, and the only control natural in the Board. Her district had confirmed her tenure regularly for more than fifty years. Her eyesight was thought to be failing, but she had all of her own yellow teeth. Her wrinkled, mahogany features showed more evidence of Indian blood than Caucasian. They all claimed to be a little afraid of her.
“Garvala,” Rembert said to her, “perhaps you can cut the matter short by giving us the answer?”
“I can’t tell you the answer-and you wouldn’t believe me if I did.” She was silent for a moment, then added, “Let the boy do as he pleases. He will anyway.”
“Do you support or oppose Mordan’s proposition?”
“Support. Not that you’re likely to go at it right.” There was a short silence. Every member in the chamber was hastily trying to recall when, if ever, Carvala had been proven to be on the wrong side of a question-in the long run.
“It would seem obvious to me,” Rembert continued, “that the only rational personal philosophy based on a conviction that we die dead, never to rise again, is a philosophy of complete hedonism. Such a hedonist might seek his pleasure in life in very subtle, indirect, and sublimated fashions; nevertheless pleasure must be his only rational purpose-no matter how lofty his conduct may appear to be. On the other hand, the possibility of something more to life than the short span we see opens up an unlimited possibility of evaluations other than hedonistic. It seems to me a fit subject to investigate.”