“Do you disagree with the policy?”
“In most cases, no, but in this instance I must take exception. Even though my theory is unproven, if correct it could have direct bearing on the success of the mission.”
“Very well, I can understand your position. However, you mentioned Tzu had two reasons for withholding the information. What was the other?”
“Actually, her second reason was merely an extension of the first.”
“Clarify.”
“The Scientists have frequently voiced suggestions or opinions in the past which you have countermanded. Not that we are critical of this. You were within your rights as Commander, and the progress of the mission has proven your judgment to be sound. However, it has caused Tzu to feel, perhaps unjustifiably so, that you will have a tendency to reject out-of-hand recommendations of the Scientists on future plans. In an effort to reestablish the credibility of our caste in your eyes, she is screening our reports to be sure that only firm, proven facts and recommendations are passed to you.
I considered this.
“I acknowledge the logic of her beliefs, Rahk, though I do not agree that they are accurate. For this reason, I will listen to your theory.
“I will ask, however,” I continued before he could speak, “that you pause first and reconsider its importance. Bypassing the chain of command, particularly in the field, can have long-lasting and undesirable aftereffects and should not be taken lightly. Are you sure your theory’s impact justifies such a risk?”
Rahk thought for several moments before responding. I waited patiently.