The servants, of course, were ineligible owing to the fact that they were beneficiaries under the will.” “And afterwards, did she entrust the will to you for safekeeping?” “No, she placed it in a drawer of her desk, which drawer she locked.” “What was done with the original will?
Did she destroy it?” “No, she locked it away with the other.” “After her death, where was the will found?” “In that same drawer. As executor I had her keys and went through her papers and business documents.” “Were both wills in the drawer?” “Yes, exactly as she had placed them there.” “Did you question her at all as to the motive for this rather surprising action?” “I did. But I got no satisfactory answer.
She merely assured me that ‘she knew what she was doing.’ ” “Nevertheless you were surprised at the proceeding?” “Very surprised. Miss Arundell, I should say, had always shown herself to have a strong sense of family feeling.” Poirot was silent a minute, then he asked: “You did not, I suppose, have any conversation with Miss Lawson on the subject?” “Certainly not. Such a proceeding would have been highly improper.” Mr. Pur vis looked scandalized at the mere suggestion.
“Did Miss Arundell say anything to indicate that Miss Lawson knew that a will was being drawn in her favour?” “On the contrary. I asked her if Miss Lawson was aware of what was being done, and Miss Arundell snapped out that she knew nothing about it.
“It was advisable, I thought, that Miss Lawson should not be aware of what had happened. I endeavoured to hint as much and Miss Arundell seemed quite of my opinion.” “Just why did you stress that point, Mr.
Purvis?” The old gentleman returned his glance with dignity.
“Such things, in my opinion, are best undiscussed.
Also it might have led to future disappointment.? ?
“Ah!” Poirot drew a long breath. “I take it that you thought it probable that Miss Arundell might change her mind in the near future?” The lawyer bowed his head.
“That is so. I fancied that Miss Arundell had had some violent altercation with her family. I thought if probable that when she cooled down she would repent of her rash decision.” “In which case she would have done– what?” “She would have given me instructions to prepare a new will.” “She might have taken the simpler course of merely destroying the will lately made, in which case the older will would have been good?” “That is a somewhat debatable point. All earlier wills, you understand, had been definitely revoked by the testator.” “But Miss Arundell would not have had the legal knowledge to appreciate that point.
She may have thought that by destroying the later will, the earlier one would stand.” “It is quite possible.” ‘Actually if she died intestate her money would pass to her family?” I “Yes. One half to Mrs. Tanios, one half divisible between Charles and Theresa Arun- I dell. But the fact remains, however, that she did not change her mind! She died with her decision unchanged.” “But that,” said Poirot, “is where I come in.”
The lawyer looked at him inquiringly.
Poirot leaned forward.
“Supposing,” he said, “that Miss Arundell, on her deathbed, wished to destroy that will. Supposing that she believed that she had destroyed it–but that, in reality, she only destroyed the first will.” Mr. Pur vis shook his head.
“No, both wills were intact.” “Then supposing she destroyed a dummy will–under the impression that she was destroying the genuine document. She was very ill, remember; it would be easy to deceive her.” “You would have to bring evidence to that effect,” said the lawyer sharply.
“Oh! undoubtedly–undoubtedly….” “Is there–may I ask–is there any reason to believe something of the kind happened?
Poirot drew back a little.
“I should not like to commit myself at this stage–” “Naturally, naturally,” said Mr. Purvis, agreeing with a phrase that was familiar to him.
“But I may say, strictly in confidence, that there are some curious features about this business!” “Really? You don’t say so?” Mr. Pur vis rubbed his hands together with a kind of pleasurable anticipation.
“What I wanted from you and what I have got,” continued Poirot, “is your opinion that Miss Arundell would, sooner or later, have changed her mind and relented towards her family.” “That is only my personal opinion, of course,” the lawyer pointed out.