X

God The Invisible King by Herbert George Wells

lake that has been fed by countless springs. It is a great pool of

living water, mingled from many sources and tainted with much

impurity. It is synthetic in its nature; it becomes simpler from

original complexities; the sediment subsides.

A life perfectly adjusted to its surroundings is a life without

mentality; no judgment is called for, no inhibition, no disturbance

of the instinctive flow of perfect reactions. Such a life is bliss,

or nirvana. It is unconsciousness below dreaming. Consciousness is

discord evoking the will to adjust; it is inseparable from need. At

every need consciousness breaks into being. Imperfect adjustments,

needs, are the rents and tatters in the smooth dark veil of being

through which the light of consciousness shines—the light of

consciousness and will of which God is the sun.

So that every need of human life, every disappointment and

dissatisfaction and call for help and effort, is a means whereby men

may and do come to the realisation of God.

There is no cardinal need, there is no sort of experience in human

life from which there does not come or has not come a contribution

to men’s religious ideas. At every challenge men have to put forth

effort, feel doubt of adequacy, be thwarted, perceive the chill

shadow of their mortality. At every challenge comes the possibility

of help from without, the idea of eluding frustration, the

aspiration towards immortality. It is possible to classify the

appeals men make for God under the headings of their chief system of

effort, their efforts to understand, their fear and their struggles

for safety and happiness, the craving of their restlessness for

peace, their angers against disorder and their desire for the

avenger; their sexual passions and perplexities… .

Each of these great systems of needs and efforts brings its own sort

of sediment into religion. Each, that is to say, has its own kind

of heresy, its distinctive misapprehension of God. It is only in

the synthesis and mutual correction of many divergent ideas that the

idea of God grows clear. The effort to understand completely, for

example, leads to the endless Heresies of Theory. Men trip over the

inherent infirmities of the human mind. But in these days one does

not argue greatly about dogma. Almost every conceivable error about

unity, about personality, about time and quantity and genus and

species, about begetting and beginning and limitation and similarity

and every kink in the difficult mind of man, has been thrust forward

in some form of dogma. Beside the errors of thought are the errors

of emotion. Fear and feebleness go straight to the Heresies that

God is Magic or that God is Providence; restless egotism at leisure

and unchallenged by urgent elementary realities breeds the Heresies

of Mysticism, anger and hate call for God’s Judgments, and the

stormy emotions of sex gave mankind the Phallic God. Those who find

themselves possessed by the new spirit in religion, realise very

speedily the necessity of clearing the mind of all these

exaggerations, transferences, and overflows of feeling. The search

for divine truth is like gold washing; nothing is of any value until

most has been swept away.

2. HERESIES OF SPECULATION

One sort of heresies stands apart from the rest. It is infinitely

the most various sort. It includes all those heresies which result

from wrong-headed mental elaboration, as distinguished from those

which are the result of hasty and imperfect apprehension, the

heresies of the clever rather than the heresies of the obtuse. The

former are of endless variety and complexity; the latter are in

comparison natural, simple confusions. The former are the errors of

the study, the latter the superstitions that spring by the wayside,

or are brought down to us in our social structure out of a barbaric

past.

To the heresies of thought and speculation belong the elaborate

doctrine of the Trinity, dogmas about God’s absolute qualities, such

odd deductions as the accepted Christian teachings about the

virginity of Mary and Joseph, and the like. All these things are

parts of orthodox Christianity. Yet none of them did Christ, even

by the Christian account, expound or recommend. He treated them as

negligible. It was left for the Alexandrians, for Alexander, for

little, red-haired, busy, wire-pulling Athanasius to find out

exactly what their Master was driving at, three centuries after

their Master was dead… .

Men still sit at little desks remote from God or life, and rack

their inadequate brains to meet fancied difficulties and state

unnecessary perfections. They seek God by logic, ignoring the

marginal error that creeps into every syllogism. Their conceit

blinds them to the limitations upon their thinking. They weave

spider-like webs of muddle and disputation across the path by which

men come to God. It would not matter very much if it were not that

simpler souls are caught in these webs. Every great religious

system in the world is choked by such webs; each system has its own.

Of all the blood-stained tangled heresies which make up doctrinal

Christianity and imprison the mind of the western world to-day, not

one seems to have been known to the nominal founder of Christianity.

Jesus Christ never certainly claimed to be the Messiah; never spoke

clearly of the Trinity; was vague upon the scheme of salvation and

the significance of his martyrdom. We are asked to suppose that he

left his apostles without instructions, that were necessary to their

eternal happiness, that he could give them the Lord’s Prayer but

leave them to guess at the all-important Creed,* and that the Church

staggered along blindly, putting its foot in and out of damnation,

until the “experts” of Nicaea, that “garland of priests,” marshalled

by Constantine’s officials, came to its rescue… . From the

conversion of Paul onward, the heresies of the intellect multiplied

about Christ’s memory and hid him from the sight of men. We are no

longer clear about the doctrine he taught nor about the things he

said and did… .

* Even the “Apostles’ Creed” is not traceable earlier than the

fourth century. It is manifestly an old, patched formulary.

Rutinius explains that it was not written down for a long time, but

transmitted orally, kept secret, and used as a sort of password

among the elect.

We are all so weary of this theology of the Christians, we are all

at heart so sceptical about their Triune God, that it is needless

here to spend any time or space upon the twenty thousand different

formulae in which the orthodox have attempted to believe in

something of the sort. There are several useful encyclopaedias of

sects and heresies, compact, but still bulky, to which the curious

may go. There are ten thousand different expositions of orthodoxy.

No one who really seeks God thinks of the Trinity, either the

Trinity of the Trinitarian or the Trinity of the Sabellian or the

Trinity of the Arian, any more than one thinks of those theories

made stone, those gods with three heads and seven hands, who sit on

lotus leaves and flourish lingams and what not, in the temples of

India. Let us leave, therefore, these morbid elaborations of the

human intelligence to drift to limbo, and come rather to the natural

heresies that spring from fundamental weaknesses of the human

character, and which are common to all religions. Against these it

is necessary to keep constant watch. They return very insidiously.

3. GOD IS NOT MAGIC

One of the most universal of these natural misconceptions of God is

to consider him as something magic serving the ends of men.

It is not easy for us to grasp at first the full meaning of giving

our souls to God. The missionary and teacher of any creed is all

too apt to hawk God for what he will fetch; he is greedy for the

poor triumph of acquiescence; and so it comes about that many people

who have been led to believe themselves religious, are in reality

still keeping back their own souls and trying to use God for their

own purposes. God is nothing more for them as yet than a

magnificent Fetish. They did not really want him, but they have

heard that he is potent stuff; their unripe souls think to make use

of him. They call upon his name, they do certain things that are

supposed to be peculiarly influential with him, such as saying

prayers and repeating gross praises of him, or reading in a blind,

industrious way that strange miscellany of Jewish and early

Christian literature, the Bible, and suchlike mental mortification,

or making the Sabbath dull and uncomfortable. In return for these

fetishistic propitiations God is supposed to interfere with the

normal course of causation in their favour. He becomes a celestial

log-roller. He remedies unfavourable accidents, cures petty

ailments, contrives unexpected gifts of medicine, money, or the

like, he averts bankruptcies, arranges profitable transactions, and

does a thousand such services for his little clique of faithful

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Categories: Wells, H.G
Oleg: