‘Ah, now we come to the gist of the matter,’ Ernest said with a pleased expression. ‘I’ll try to tell you why not, though the telling will be rather hard. You see, you fellows have studied business, in a small way, but you have not studied social evolution at all. You are in the midst of a transition stage now in economic evolution, but you do not understand it, and that’s what causes all the confusion. Why cannot you return? Because you can’t. You can no more cause the tide of economic evolution to flow back in its channel along the way it came than you can make water run uphill. Joshua made the sun stand still upon Gibeon, but you would outdo Joshua. You would make the sun go backward in the sky. You would have time retrace its steps from noon to morning.
‘In a face of labour-saving machinery, of organised production, of the increased efficiency of combination, you would set the economic sun back a whole generation or so to the time when there were no great capitalists, no great machinery, no railroads—a time when a host of little capitalists warred with each other in economic anarchy, and when production was primitive, wasteful, unorganised, and costly. Believe me, Joshua’s task was easier, and he had Jehovah to help him. But God has forsaken you small capitalists. The sun of the small capitalists is setting. It will never rise again. Nor is it in your power even to make it stand still. You are perishing, and you are doomed to perish utterly from the face of society.
‘This is the fiat of evolution. It is the word of God. Combination is stronger than competition. Primitive man was a puny creature hiding in the crevices of the rocks. He combined and made war upon his carnivorous enemies. They were competitive beasts. Primitive man was a combinative beast, and because of it he rose to primacy over all the animals. And man has been achieving greater and greater combinations ever since. It is combination versus competition, a thousand centuries long struggle, in which competition has always been worsted. Who so enlists on the side of competition perishes.’
‘But the trusts themselves arose out of competition,’ Mr Calvin interrupted.
‘Very true,’ Ernest answered. ‘And the trusts themselves destroyed competition. That, by your own word, is why you are no longer in the dairy business.’
The first laughter of the evening went around the table, and even Mr Calvin joined in the laugh against himself.
‘And now, while we are on the trusts,’ Ernest went on, ‘let us settle a few things. I shall make certain statements, and if you disagree with them, speak up. Silence will mean agreement. Is it not true that a machine-loom will weave more cloth and weave more cheaply than a hand-loom?’ He paused, but nobody spoke up. ‘Is it not then highly irrational to break the machine-loom and go back to the clumsy and more costly hand-loom method of weaving?’ Heads nodded in acquiescence. ‘Is it not true that that combination known as a trust produces more efficiently and cheaply than can a thousand competing small concerns?’ Still no one objected. ‘Then is it not irrational to destroy that cheap and efficient combination?’
No one answered for a long time. Then Mr Kowalt spoke.
‘What are we to do, then?’ he demanded. ‘To destroy the trusts is the only way we can see to escape their domination.’
Ernest was all fire and aliveness on the instant.
‘I’ll show you another way!’ he cried. ‘Let us not destroy those wonderful machines that produce efficiently and cheaply. Let us control them. Let us profit by their efficiency and cheapness. Let us run them for ourselves. Let us oust the present owners of the wonderful machines, and let us own the wonderful machines ourselves. That, gentlemen, is socialism, a greater combination than the trusts, a greater economic and social combination than any that has as yet appeared on the planet. It is in line with evolution. We meet combination with greater combination. It is the winning side. Come on over with us socialists and play on the winning side.’
Here arose dissent. There was a shaking of heads, and muttering arose.
‘All right, then, you prefer to be anachronisms,’ Ernest laughed. ‘You prefer to play atavistic roles. You are doomed to perish as all atavisms perish. Have you ever asked what will happen to you when greater combinations than even the present trusts arise? Have you ever considered where you will stand when the great trusts themselves combine into the combination of combinations—into the social, economic, and political trust?’
He turned abruptly and irrelevantly upon Mr Calvin.
‘Tell me,’ Ernest said, ‘if this is not true. You are compelled to form a new political party because the old parties are in the hands of the trusts. The chief obstacle to your Grange propaganda is the trusts. Behind every obstacle you encounter, every blow that smites you, every defeat that you receive, is the hand of the trusts. Is this not so? Tell me.’
Mr Calvin sat in uncomfortable silence.
‘Go ahead,’ Ernest encouraged.
‘It is true,’ Mr Calvin confessed. ‘We captured the state legislature of Oregon and put through splendid protective legislation, and it was vetoed by the governor, who was a creature of the trusts. We elected a governor of Colorado, and the legislature refused to permit him to take office. Twice we have passed a national income tax, and each time the supreme court smashed it as unconstitutional. The courts are in the hands of the trusts. We, the people, do not pay our judges sufficiently. But there will come a time—’
‘When the combination of the trusts will control all legislation, when the combination of the trusts will itself be the Government,’ Ernest interrupted.
‘Never! never!’ were the cries that arose. Everybody was excited and belligerent.
‘Tell me,’ Ernest demanded, ‘what will you do when such a time comes?’
‘We will rise in our strength!’ Mr Asmunsen cried, and many voices backed his decision.
‘That will be civil war,’ Ernest warned them.
‘So be it civil war,’ was Mr Asmunsen’s answer, with the cries of all the men at the table behind him. ‘We have not forgotten the deeds of our forefathers. For our liberties we are ready to fight and die.’
Ernest smiled.
‘Do not forget,’ he said, ‘that we had tacitly agreed that liberty in your case, gentlemen, means liberty to squeeze profits out of others.’
The table was angry, now, fighting angry; but Ernest controlled the tumult and made himself heard.
‘One more question. When you rise in your strength, remember, the reason for your rising will be that the Government is in the hands of the trusts. Therefore, against your strength the Government will turn the regular army, the navy, the militia, the police—in short, the whole organised war machinery of the United States. Where will your strength be then?’
Dismay sat on their faces, and before they could recover, Ernest struck again.
‘Do you remember, not so long ago, when our regular army was only fifty thousand? Year by year it has been increased until today it is three hundred thousand.’
Again he struck.
‘Nor is that all. While you diligently pursued that favourite phantom of yours, called profits, and moralised about that favourite fetish of yours, called competition, even greater and more direful things have been accomplished by combination. There is the militia.’
‘It is our strength!’ cried Mr Kowalt. ‘With it we would repel the invasion of the regular army.’
‘You would go into the militia yourself,’ was Ernest’s retort, ‘and be sent to Maine, or Florida, or the Philippines, or anywhere else, to drown in blood your own comrades civil-warring for their liberties. While from Kansas, or Wisconsin, or any other state, your own comrades would go into the militia and come here to California to drown in blood your own civil-warring.’
Now they were really shocked, and they sat wordless, until Mr Owen murmured:
‘We would not go into the militia. That would settle it. We would not be so foolish.’
Ernest laughed outright.
‘You do not understand the combination that has been effected. You could not help yourself. You would be drafted into the militia.’
‘There is such a thing as civil law,’ Mr Owen insisted.
‘Not when the Government suspends civil law. In that day when you speak of rising in your strength, your strength would be turned against yourself. Into the militia you would go, willy-nilly. Habeas corpus, I heard some one mutter just now. Instead of habeas corpus you would get post mortems. If you refused to go into the militia, or to obey after you were in, you would be tried by drumhead court martial and shot down like dogs. It is the law.’
‘It is not the law!’ Mr Calvin asserted positively. ‘There is no such law. Young man, you have Dreamed all this. Why, you spoke of sending the militia to the Philippines. That is unconstitutional. The Constitution especially states that the militia cannot be sent out of the country.’