The Lost Worlds of 2001 by Arthur Clarke

And then it was far, far too late.

ANCESTRAL VOICES

The ape-man stood on a low, rocky hill, grasping a pointed stone and looking out across a dusty African plain. Overhead, the sky was cloudless, and a hot sun baked the yellowing grass of the savannah and the stunted trees which provided the only shade. In the middle distance, a small herd of gazelles was browsing, watched intently by a saber-toothed tiger crouching in the scrub.

There were more ape-men-about a dozen of them- scattered over the crown of the little hill. Propped up against a large boulder, one female was nursing her baby; not far away, two juveniles were quarreling over a hunk of meat-all that was left of some small dismembered animal. One bent and gray-haired male was trying to suck the marrow from a cracked bone; another was curled up asleep; two females were grooming each other for lice; and yet another male was hunting through a pile of dried bones in search of future weapons.

“It’s a beautiful model,” said Bowman at last, when he and his two companions had looked their fill.

“Thank you,” answered the curator of Anthropology. “It’s as accurate as humanly possible several years of work went into it.”

Dr. Anna Brailsford was a striking, dark-haired woman in her early forties, who seemed much too vivacious to have devoted her life to fossils. Though she was a famous explorer and veteran of many expeditions, she had lost none of her femininity; it was hard to believe that she was one of the world’s leading authorities on early Man.

“So these,” said Phillip Goode, Bowman’s understudy, “are the characters the pyramid-makers would have met, if they landed on Earth three million years ago?”

“Not necessarily. It depends on the thoroughness of their investigation. Australopithecus was probably not very common; he might easily have been overlooked among the elephants and giraffes and other more conspicuous animals. In fact, he wasn’t even the most impressive of the primates. To a casual visitor, he might have seemed just another ape.”

It was rather difficult, thought Bowman, to take so detached a view. His great-to-the-hundred- thousandth grandfather was not a very prepossessing sight, but there was a wistful sadness about the hairy, no-longer-quite animal face staring at him through the glass of the diorama. He was not ashamed to admit kinship with his remote ancestor across the unimaginable ages that sundered them. “I rather doubt,” he said dryly, “that creatures landing on Earth back in the Pleistocene would have been casual visitors. And this is one of the things we wanted to discuss with you-their motivations.”

“Well, I can only tell you how I’d behave, in the same circumstances. I’d note that Earth was teeming with advanced life forms, but that none of them had developed high intelligence. However, I’d probably guess-I might even be able to predict, with the knowledge I’d undoubtedly have-that intelligence would arise in a few million years.

“So I’d leave behind some intelligence monitors-or, better still, civilization detectors. I might put some of them on Earth, though I’d realize that they would probably be destroyed or buried before they had a chance to operate. But the Moon would be an ideal spot for such a device especially if I was only interested in civilizations that had reached the space-faring stage. Any culture still planet-bound might be too primitive to concern me.”

“So you’re in favor of the fire-alarm theory, as we call it, to explain TMA-1?”

“Yes-it seems very plausible. But perhaps it’s too plausible. Human motivations vary so much that any attempt to analyze wholly alien behavior must be pure guesswork.”

“But guesswork is all we have to go on for the present. We’re trying to think of every possibility that may arise, when and if we do catch up with the creatures who built TMA-1.”

Bowman pointed to the frozen tableau of his ancestors.

“Look how far we’ve progressed since then! Yet after that same three million years, where will the pyramid makers be? I don’t mind admitting it-the thought sometimes scares me.”

“It scares me. But remember, progress is never uniform; even after three million years, they may not be incomprehensibly far ahead of us. Perhaps there’s a plateau for intelligence that can’t be exceeded. They may already have reached it when they visited the Moon. After all, it has yet to be proved that intelligence has real survival value.”

“I can’t accept that!” protested Bowman. “Surely, our intelligence has made us what we are-the most successful animals on the planet!”

“As an anthropologist, I’m naturally biased in favor of Man. From the short-term point of view, intelligence has undoubtedly been an advantage. But what about geological time-and how do you define a ‘successful’ species? My friend the curator of reptiles keeps reminding me that the dinosaurs flourished for more than a hundred million years. And their I.Q.’s were distinctly minimal.”

“Well, where are they now? I don’t see any around today.”

“True-but you can’t call a hundred-million-year reign a failure; it’s a thousand times as long as Homo sapiens has existed. There may be an optimum level of intelligence, and perhaps we’ve already exceeded it. Our brains may be too big-dooming us as Triceratops was doomed by his armor. He overspecialized in horns and spikes and plates; we overspecialized in cerebral cortex. The end result may be the same.”

“So you believe that as soon as a species reaches more than a certain level of intelligence, it is heading for extinction?”

“I don’t state it as a fact, I’m merely pointing out the possibilities. There’s no reason to assume that the universe has the slightest interest in intelligence-or even in life. Both may be random, accidental by-products of its operations, like the beautiful patterns on a butterfly’s wing. The insect would fly just as well without them; our species might survive as long as-oh, the sharks, which haven’t changed much in a couple of hundred million years-if we were a little less clever. Look at the daily newspapers, and the history of the whole twentieth century.”

Dr. Brailsford smiled at her obviously disapproving audience.

“No-I’m not a pessimist,” she said, answering their unspoken accusation. “Just a realist, who knows that only a tiny fraction of the species that have lived on this planet have any descendants today. And because I am a realist, perhaps I understand the importance of your project better than you do.”

“Go on, please.”

“The creatures who built the pyramid-how far ahead of us would you say they were from the technical viewpoint?”

“Probably no more than a hundred years, at our present rate of progress.”

“Exactly. Now suppose that they are still in existence, even if they’ve made little progress during the three million years since they visited the Moon. Don’t you see-this will be the first definite proof that intelligence does have real survival value. That will be very reassuring.”

“Quite frankly, doctor,” said Goode, “I don’t need any reassurance. Even if intelligence has limited survival value, it has a good deal of comfort value. I wouldn’t change places with them.” He jerked his thumb toward the tableau of ape-men.

The anthropologist joined in the laughter; then she became serious again.

“There’s another possibility, though-and that’s cultural shock. If they are too advanced, and we come into contact with them, we may not be able to survive the impact psychologically. As Jung put it, half a century ago, we might find all our aspirations so outmoded as to leave us completely paralyzed. He used a rather striking phrase- we might find ourselves ‘without dreams.’ Like the Atlanteans, you know-Herodotus said that they never dreamed. I always thought that made them peculiarly inhuman-and pitiable.”

“I don’t believe in cultural shock,” said Hunter. “After all, we expect to meet a very advanced society. It wouldn’t be such an overwhelming surprise to us as-well, as it would be to him, if he was suddenly dumped here in Manhattan.”

“I think you are too-optimistic,” answered Dr. Brailsford; Bowman guessed that she had been tempted to use the word “naive.” “On our planet, societies only a few generations apart culturally have proved to be incompatible.”

“Perhaps our Pleistocene astronauts were aware of the danger-perhaps that’s why they’ve left us alone, all these years.”

“Have they?” said the anthropologist. “I wonder. If you’d like to come to my office now, I’ve something to show you.”

They walked out of the Leakey Memorial Exhibit, through the great, cathedral-like halls of the museum. From time to time Bowman was recognized by other visitors, and several eager youngsters rushed up for his autograph. Goode and Hunter were not asked for theirs, but they were accustomed to this; Goode was fond of quoting, a little ironically, Milton’s line “They also serve who only stand and wait.”

Bowman’s relationship with his two understudies was, on the whole, excellent-which was not surprising, for their intellectual and psychological profiles had been matched with great care. They were colleagues, not competitors, and they were often able to act as his alter egos, reporting back to him after missions and trips which he was too busy to make. Of course, each hoped that he would be the one finally selected, but they served Bowman loyally and with the minimum of friction. They had had disagreements, but never a serious quarrel-and so it had been with the other five trios. The psychologists had done their work well; but by this time, they had had plenty of practice.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *