Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave

her post; and woe betides them who hear not this

morning summons to the field; for if they are not

awakened by the sense of hearing, they are by the

sense of feeling: no age nor sex finds any favor.

Mr. Severe, the overseer, used to stand by the door

of the quarter, armed with a large hickory stick

and heavy cowskin, ready to whip any one who was

so unfortunate as not to hear, or, from any other

cause, was prevented from being ready to start for

the field at the sound of the horn.

Mr. Severe was rightly named: he was a cruel

man. I have seen him whip a woman, causing the

blood to run half an hour at the time; and this, too,

in the midst of her crying children, pleading for their

mother’s release. He seemed to take pleasure in

manifesting his fiendish barbarity. Added to his

cruelty, he was a profane swearer. It was enough to

chill the blood and stiffen the hair of an ordinary

man to hear him talk. Scarce a sentence escaped him

but that was commenced or concluded by some hor-

rid oath. The field was the place to witness his

cruelty and profanity. His presence made it both

the field of blood and of blasphemy. From the rising

till the going down of the sun, he was cursing, raving,

cutting, and slashing among the slaves of the field,

in the most frightful manner. His career was short.

He died very soon after I went to Colonel Lloyd’s;

and he died as he lived, uttering, with his dying

groans, bitter curses and horrid oaths. His death was

regarded by the slaves as the result of a merciful

providence.

Mr. Severe’s place was filled by a Mr. Hopkins.

He was a very different man. He was less cruel, less

profane, and made less noise, than Mr. Severe. His

course was characterized by no extraordinary demon-

strations of cruelty. He whipped, but seemed to take

no pleasure in it. He was called by the slaves a good

overseer.

The home plantation of Colonel Lloyd wore the

appearance of a country village. All the mechanical

operations for all the farms were performed here.

The shoemaking and mending, the blacksmithing,

cartwrighting, coopering, weaving, and grain-grind-

ing, were all performed by the slaves on the home

plantation. The whole place wore a business-like as-

pect very unlike the neighboring farms. The num-

ber of houses, too, conspired to give it advantage

over the neighboring farms. It was called by the

slaves the GREAT HOUSE FARM. Few privileges were

esteemed higher, by the slaves of the out-farms, than

that of being selected to do errands at the Great

House Farm. It was associated in their minds with

greatness. A representative could not be prouder of

his election to a seat in the American Congress,

than a slave on one of the out-farms would be of his

election to do errands at the Great House Farm.

They regarded it as evidence of great confidence re-

posed in them by their overseers; and it was on

this account, as well as a constant desire to be out of

the field from under the driver’s lash, that they es-

teemed it a high privilege, one worth careful living

for. He was called the smartest and most trusty fel-

low, who had this honor conferred upon him the

most frequently. The competitors for this office

sought as diligently to please their overseers, as the

office-seekers in the political parties seek to please

and deceive the people. The same traits of character

might be seen in Colonel Lloyd’s slaves, as are seen

in the slaves of the political parties.

The slaves selected to go to the Great House Farm,

for the monthly allowance for themselves and their

fellow-slaves, were peculiarly enthusiastic. While on

their way, they would make the dense old woods,

for miles around, reverberate with their wild songs,

revealing at once the highest joy and the deepest

sadness. They would compose and sing as they went

along, consulting neither time nor tune. The thought

that came up, came out — if not in the word, in the

sound; — and as frequently in the one as in the other.

They would sometimes sing the most pathetic senti-

ment in the most rapturous tone, and the most rap-

turous sentiment in the most pathetic tone. Into all

of their songs they would manage to weave some-

thing of the Great House Farm. Especially would

they do this, when leaving home. They would then

sing most exultingly the following words: —

“I am going away to the Great House Farm!

O, yea! O, yea! O!”

This they would sing, as a chorus, to words which to

many would seem unmeaning jargon, but which,

nevertheless, were full of meaning to themselves. I

have sometimes thought that the mere hearing of

those songs would do more to impress some minds

with the horrible character of slavery, than the read-

ing of whole volumes of philosophy on the subject

could do.

I did not, when a slave, understand the deep

meaning of those rude and apparently incoherent

songs. I was myself within the circle; so that I nei-

ther saw nor heard as those without might see and

hear. They told a tale of woe which was then al-

together beyond my feeble comprehension; they

were tones loud, long, and deep; they breathed the

prayer and complaint of souls boiling over with the

bitterest anguish. Every tone was a testimony against

slavery, and a prayer to God for deliverance from

chains. The hearing of those wild notes always de-

pressed my spirit, and filled me with ineffable sad-

ness. I have frequently found myself in tears while

hearing them. The mere recurrence to those songs,

even now, afflicts me; and while I am writing these

lines, an expression of feeling has already found its

way down my cheek. To those songs I trace my first

glimmering conception of the dehumanizing char-

acter of slavery. I can never get rid of that concep-

tion. Those songs still follow me, to deepen my

hatred of slavery, and quicken my sympathies for

my brethren in bonds. If any one wishes to be im-

pressed with the soul-killing effects of slavery, let

him go to Colonel Lloyd’s plantation, and, on allow-

ance-day, place himself in the deep pine woods, and

there let him, in silence, analyze the sounds that

shall pass through the chambers of his soul, — and if

he is not thus impressed, it will only be because

“there is no flesh in his obdurate heart.”

I have often been utterly astonished, since I came

to the north, to find persons who could speak of

the singing, among slaves, as evidence of their con-

tentment and happiness. It is impossible to conceive

of a greater mistake. Slaves sing most when they are

most unhappy. The songs of the slave represent the

sorrows of his heart; and he is relieved by them, only

as an aching heart is relieved by its tears. At least,

such is my experience. I have often sung to drown

my sorrow, but seldom to express my happiness.

Crying for joy, and singing for joy, were alike un-

common to me while in the jaws of slavery. The

singing of a man cast away upon a desolate island

might be as appropriately considered as evidence of

contentment and happiness, as the singing of a

slave; the songs of the one and of the other are

prompted by the same emotion.

[blank page]

III

Colonel Lloyd kept a large and finely cultivated

garden, which afforded almost constant employment

for four men, besides the chief gardener, (Mr.

M’Durmond.) This garden was probably the great-

est attraction of the place. During the summer

months, people came from far and near — from

Baltimore, Easton, and Annapolis — to see it. It

abounded in fruits of almost every description, from

the hardy apple of the north to the delicate orange

of the south. This garden was not the least source

of trouble on the plantation. Its excellent fruit was

quite a temptation to the hungry swarms of boys,

as well as the older slaves, belonging to the colonel,

few of whom had the virtue or the vice to resist

it. Scarcely a day passed, during the summer, but

that some slave had to take the lash for stealing fruit.

The colonel had to resort to all kinds of stratagems

to keep his slaves out of the garden. The last and

most successful one was that of tarring his fence

all around; after which, if a slave was caught with

any tar upon his person, it was deemed sufficient

proof that he had either been into the garden, or had

tried to get in. In either case, he was severely whip-

ped by the chief gardener. This plan worked well;

the slaves became as fearful of tar as of the lash.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *