4. Bad feedback and employee has failed his or her performance improvement plan: It is the firm’s responsibility to terminate the employee or move him or her into a position that requires fewer skills.
The 10 Percent Attrition Model
The 10 percent attrition model is focused on improving the average performance of the firm professionals by creating attrition in the poorest performing 10 percent of staff every year. In this model, the firm releases the bottom 10 percent of the workforce annually. This process ensures that the firm is constantly upgrading the team. It also helps the workers falling in the bottom 10 percent. This model is applicable to mid-size and large professional services firms. After a few cycles, the firm professionals will be a stable, high-quality group, and the attrition model may no longer apply; however, we have found this situation to be the exception. Although there are costs to any type of employee turnover, the costs of an ineffective, poorly performing team far outweigh the impact of turning out the poor performers.
To accomplish this attrition, during each review cycle, the firm management team should rank professional staff according to their relative performance. One method is to adopt the A, B, C, D model, which equates A to the top 10 percent of performers, B to the middle 60 percent, C to the next 20
percent, and D to the bottom 10 percent. Adhering to a 10 percent attrition model, particularly for the struggling firm, is effective because the cost of D
staffers is significant.
The obvious costs include compensating employees who are not producing value for the organization. However, this is only a small portion of the cost to the department. D players traditionally command a disproportionate amount of management attention because of either personal issues or performance problems. The management attention could be used for driving projects forward and otherwise ensuring the firm’s success.
Further, management or teammates have to cover for the nonperformance of the D-ranked staff members. Finally, and most corrosive, D performers
232
Attracting and Retaining the Best Professionals
tend to drive away the A and B players, who ask, “ Why am I getting paid the same amount for producing twice as much work?” Management attention should be spent on caring for and developing A and B players and on reducing their attrition to zero. The forced attrition model and an employee swap analysis are powerful tools for managing a world-class professional services firm.
Training Programs for Professional Development
Training programs for professional staff can be a powerful tool for improving both staff performance and for staff satisfaction.
The hallmarks of a good training program are:
• Relevance: The training should provide skills directly useful to the professional in the execution of the major portion of their responsibilities, for example, legal research training for entry-level attorneys or project management training for managers.
• Timeliness: The best training is timely as well, and is delivered to staff at the point in their career where they have enough experience for the training to be relevant but early enough that they can reap the benefits of it.
• Linkage to promotion objectives: Training often takes a back seat to billability objectives, client work, and other unavoidable business emergencies. However, because training is an effective and important way of improving staff performance, the firm must find ways to promote and
enforce objectives. One way to ensure that this happens is by tying standard training classes to promotion objectives.
Professional staff value training because they enjoy the challenge of learning new skills, and they recognize that keeping skills current (particularly for professionals in areas with rapidly changing skills required, such as technology) ensures interesting future assignments and helps guarantee job security.
To facilitate the delivery of this benefit, each position identified for the organization (as outlined previously in this chapter) should have a specific training regimen. This regimen should include both recommended and required training for each level. Promotion should be made contingent, in part, on completing the required training. Firm management can work to establish a training program and can help with conducting training, tracking completion and certification, as well as identifying outside providers for delivery of the training. This should be done in conjunction with the professional staff, who can be helpful in identifying the training that would be both interesting and useful for their role.
Career Tracks, Compensation, and Professional Development 233
Because training, particularly training conducted by outside providers, invariably involves significant time and expense for the company, firm management may want to consider asking employees to make a reciprocal commitment to the organization. In exchange for the training, staff may sign a training certificate. This certificate outlines the training program and the cost for each piece. Employees should sign an agreement stating that they will reimburse the company for training costs if they leave the company voluntarily within 12 months after they complete the course. This acknowledgment accomplishes two things. First, it demonstrates to employees the actual dollar amounts invested by the department in their training. Second, it reduces the risk of investing in employees who depart the company as soon as they receive the training, lowering attrition in the firm.
As employees receive training, their market value increases, and they will likely graduate from one job to the next. To keep the staff interested and engaged, they must be provided opportunities to move ahead, use the new skills they have learned, and continue to learn new professional skills. If the company does not provide its team with these opportunities, the best employees will find an employer who will. Providing training, development, and a chance to use new skills generates a tremendous amount of loyalty and goodwill.
In some cases, the team member may be trained out of the company. After employees complete a training regimen and improve their skills, their value increases. At some point, the organization may not be able to provide them with the on-the-job responsibility that they would command in the open market and they may elect to move on. This is a natural outcome of having qualified employees and, while employee retention is critical, should not be cause for alarm.
We have heard good managers characterize it thus: “The department
should be more like a college than a prison. We miss our best team members when they elect to move on, but if we cannot provide them opportunities to grow, then they must seek them on the open market.” Allowing employees to leave on good terms also means that they may return eventually.
Providing rigorous training and development opportunities will entail some short-term expense for the firm, but it will be a crucial factor in the department’s ability to retain the “A” players. Firms that fail to train, develop, and challenge their staff will retain only those who cannot find employment elsewhere.
For smaller firms with limited training budgets, creative approaches may be required to achieve professional development goals. Self-study, training provided by outside firms, or teaming with other small firms are some ways that this can be accomplished.
For firms of all types, voluntary training can be helpful, particularly for skills that are useful but fall outside the normal on-the-job experiences of the professional staff. One technology services company, seeking to improve the decision-making capabilities of its management employees, embarked on a
234
Attracting and Retaining the Best Professionals
“book club.” The manager group signed up for readings and group discussions of a selection of landmark books on the topic of decision science. This was a low-effort, low-cost, high-impact way of accomplishing training that could not be accomplished as part of the day-to-day execution of the business.
Another often-overlooked source of training is simple networking and involvement in outside industry groups. Professionals can get significant advice and new viewpoints from discussing issues they are facing in the management of their firm or delivery of their service with others in the same or similar businesses. Professional networking groups that facilitate such meetings are easy to locate for a given geography and profession and can generate a large return on the time invested in them.
Certain professions or roles may have specific certifications that are helpful (or essential). The technology services business is rife with certifications; the fields of law, accounting, real estate, and architecture have a variety of professional certifications that are required or are helpful. As with training, the firm may elect to link the achievement or retention of certain certifications to promotion and advancement.
Finally, firms of a certain size may elect to create a department or group dedicated to professional training. Firms with more than 100 professionals may consider having at least one resource dedicated to internal training.
Other factors determining the need for dedicated internal training resources include highly specific skills or knowledge needed to deliver firm services and high attrition rates resulting in large numbers of new staff over a long period of time.
Management Coaching
Much of the day-to-day professional development in a services firm comes from direct manager feedback to staff, delivered on an ongoing basis. This informal, real-time feedback is an important kind of training for staff; therefore, managers should be aware of the best ways to work with their teams in providing feedback.