The Bear & The Dragon by Clancey, Tom

“We all saw those horrible pictures on the television this morning, the deaths of Renato Cardinal DiMilo, the Papal Nuncio to the People’s Republic of China, and the Reverend Yu Fa An, who, we believe, was a native of the Republic of China and educated at Oral Roberts Univer­sity in Oklahoma. First of all, the United States of America extends our condolences to the families of both men. Second, we call upon the gov­ernment of the People’s Republic to launch an immediate and full in­vestigation of this horrible tragedy, to determine who, if anyone, was at fault, and if someone was at fault, for such person or persons to be pros­ecuted to the full extent of the law.

“The death of a diplomat at the hands of an agent of a government is a gross violation of international treaty and convention. It is a quin­tessentially uncivilized act that must be set right as quickly and defini­tively as possible. Peaceful relations between nations cannot exist without diplomacy, and diplomacy cannot be carried out except through men and women whose personal safety is sacrosanct. That has been the case for literally thousands of years. Even in time of war, the lives of diplomats have always been protected by all sides for this very reason. We require that the government of the PRC explain this tragic event and take proper action to see to it that nothing of this sort will ever happen again. That concludes my statement. Questions?” Ryan looked up, try­ing not to brace too obviously for the storm that was about to break.

“Mr. President,” the Associated Press said, “the two clergymen who died were there to prevent an abortion. Does that affect your reaction to this incident?”

Ryan allowed himself to show surprise at the stupid question: “My views on abortion are on the public record, but I think everyone, even the pro-choice community, would respond negatively to what happened here. The woman in question did not choose to have an abortion, but the Chinese government tried to impose its will on her by killing a full-term fetus about to be born. If anyone did that in the United States, that person would be guilty of a felony—probably more than one—yet that is government policy in the People’s Republic. As you know, I person­ally object to abortion on moral grounds, but what we saw attempted on TV this morning is worse even than that. It’s an act of incompre­hensible barbarism. Those two courageous men tried to stop it, and they were killed for their efforts, but, thank God, the baby appears to have survived. Next question?” Ryan pointed next to a known trouble­maker.

“Mr. President,” the Boston Globe said, “the government’s action grew out of the People’s Republic’s population-control policy. Is it our place to criticize a country’s internal policy?”

Christ, Ryan thought, another one? “You know, once upon a time, a fellow named Hitler tried to manage the population of his country— in fact, of a lot of Europe—by killing the mentally infirm, the socially undesirable, and those whose religions he didn’t like. Now, yes, Germany was a nation-state, and we even had diplomatic relations with Hitler until December 1941. But are you saying that America does not have the right to object to a policy we consider barbaric just because it is the official policy of a nation-state? Hermann Goring tried that defense at the Nuremberg Trials. Do you want the United States of America to rec­ognize it?” Jack demanded.

The reporter wasn’t as used to answering questions as to asking them. Then she saw that the cameras were pointed her way, and she was having a bad-hair day. Her response, therefore, could have been a little better: “Mr. President, is it possible that your views of abortion have af­fected your reaction to this event?”

“No, ma’am. I’ve disapproved of murder even longer than I’ve ob­jected to abortion,” Ryan replied coldly.

“But you’ve just compared the People’s Republic of China to Hitler’s Germany,” the Globe reporter pointed out. You can’t say that about them!

“Both countries shared a view of population control that is anti­thetical to American traditions. Or do you approve of imposing late-term abortions on women who choose not to have one?”

“Sir, I’m not the President,” the Globe replied, as she sat down, avoiding the question, but not the embarrassed blush.

“Mr. President,” began the San Francisco Examiner, “whether we like it or not, China has decided for itself what sort of laws it wants to have, and the two men who died this morning were interfering with those laws, weren’t they?”

“The Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King interfered with the laws of Mississippi and Alabama back when I was in high school. Did the Examiner object to his actions then?”

“Well, no, but—”

“But we regard the personal human conscience as a sovereign force, don’t we?” Jack shot back. “The principle goes back to St. Augustine, when he said that an unjust law is no law. Now, you guys in the media agree with that principle. Is it only when you happen to agree with the person operating on that principle? Isn’t that intellectually dishonest? I do not personally approve of abortion. You all know that. I’ve taken a considerable amount of heat for that personal belief, some of which has been laid on me by you good people. Fine. The Constitution allows us all to feel the way we choose. But the Constitution does not allow me not to enforce the law against people who blow up abortion clinics. I can sympathize with their overall point of view, but I cannot agree or sympathize with the use of violence to pursue a political position. We call that terrorism, and it’s against the law, and I have sworn an oath to en­force the law fully and fairly in all cases, regardless of how I may or may not feel on a particular issue.

“Therefore, if you do not apply it evenhandedly, ladies and gentle­men, it is not a principle at all, but ideology, and it is not very helpful to the way we govern our lives and our country.

“Now, on the broader question, you said that China has chosen its laws. Has it? Has it really? The People’s Republic is not, unfortunately, a democratic country. It is a place where the laws are imposed by an elite few. Two courageous men died yesterday objecting to those laws, and in the successful attempt to save the life of an unborn child. Throughout history, men have given up their lives for worse causes than that. Those men are heroes by any definition, but I do not think anyone in this room, or for that matter anyone in our country, believes that they de­served to die, heroically or not. The penalty for civil disobedience is not supposed to be death. Even in the darkest days of the 1960s, when black Americans were working to secure their civil rights, the police in the southern states did not commit wholesale murder. And those local cops and members of the Ku Klux Klan who did step over that line were ar­rested and convicted by the FBI and the Justice Department.

“In short, there are fundamental differences between the People’s Republic of China and America, and of the two systems, I much prefer ours.”

Ryan escaped the press room ten minutes later, to find Arnie stand­ing at the top of the ramp.

“Very good, Jack.”

“Oh?” The President had learned to fear that tone of voice.

“Yeah, you just compared the People’s Republic of China to Nazi Germany and the Ku Klux Klan.”

“Arnie, why is it that the media feel such great solicitude for com­munist countries?”

“They don’t, and—”

“The hell they don’t! I just compared the PRC to Nazi Germany and they damned near wet their pants. Well, guess what? Mao murdered more people than Hitler did. That’s public knowledge—I remember when CIA released the study that documented it—but they ignore it. Is some Chinese citizen killed by Mao less dead than some poor Polish bas­tard killed by Hitler?”

“Jack, they have their sensibilities,” van Damm told his President.

“Yeah? Well, just once in a while, I wish they’d display something I can recognize as a principle.” With that, Ryan strode back to his office, practically trailing smoke from his ears.

“Temper, Jack, temper,” Arnie said to no one in particular. The President still had to learn the first principle of political life, the ability to treat a son of a bitch like your best friend, because the needs of your nation depended on it. The world would be a better place if it were as simple as Ryan wished, the Chief of Staff thought. But it wasn’t, and it showed no prospect of becoming so.

A few blocks away at Foggy Bottom, Scott Adler had finished cring­ing and was making notes on how to mend the fences that his Pres­ident had just kicked over. He’d have to sit down with Jack and go over a few things, like the principles he held so dear.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243

Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *