The Bible on Leadership by Lorin Woolfe

that might emanate from the leaders of a less inspired company (my

apologies if this too closely resembles the communications at your com-

pany):

❖ Weekly unit meetings are mandatory for all staff.

❖ Please bring all sales reports and spreadsheets.

❖ The agenda is attached; please submit your discussion items at

least three days in advance of the meeting.

98

THE BIBLE ON LEADERSHIP

❖ If anyone fails to attend the meeting, your supervisor will be

contacted.

Robert Marcell, head of Chrysler’s small-car design team in the early

1990s, was faced with a serious communication and morale problem.

He felt that despite the increasing Japanese domination of the small car

market, Chrysler had the ability to manufacture and market a domesti-

cally made small car. His problem? Many others within Chrysler, in-

cluding his own team, doubted Chrysler’s ability to do this alone and

wanted to partner with a foreign manufacturer.

Marcell could have done a statistical study or issued a dry report on

trends in the domestic and international small-car market. Instead, he

decided to take a more daring and hard-hitting communication ap-

proach. Reasoning that he had to hit people ‘‘where they lived’’ (emo-

tionally and geographically), he prepared a fifteen-minute slide show

that showed pictures of his hometown, a Michigan mining community

devastated by competition from foreign companies.

After each slide of boarded-up schools, the ruins of the town’s iron-

works, and closed churches, Marcell solemnly and simply announced,

‘‘We couldn’t compete.’’ He then observed that the same thing could

happen to Detroit unless at least one car company was willing to re-

enter the subcompact market. He then challenged the group to develop

an American subcompact and went directly to CEO Lee Iacocca to

make a similar emotional appeal: ‘‘If we dare to be different, we could

be the reason the U.S. auto industry survives. We could be the reason

our kids and grandkids don’t end up working at fast-food chains.’’13

Iacocca also responded on a gut level (backed up by statistics, of

course) to Marcell’s impassioned appeal. He gave the OK to begin de-

signing and manufacturing the Dodge Neon.

Centuries earlier, Paul was a master at targeting the needs of his audi-

ence; he had to be, since he was so frequently fleeing a city or desper-

ately defending himself from death in the courts. In Acts 22, he finds

himself arrested and surrounded by an angry Jerusalem mob that de-

mands that the soldiers do away with him because he is challenging the

religious orthodoxy prevailing in the city.

Communication

99

A lesser man might have been rendered speechless, but Paul quickly

sized up his audience. First, he addressed them in their own language,

Aramaic, and implored them: ‘‘Brothers and fathers, listen now to my

defense.’’ When they heard him speak to them in Aramaic, they became

very quiet. Paul then established his credentials as one of the crowd, a

Jew, albeit one who had been through a very strange and exciting spiri-

tual experience. He challenged the commander’s right to flog him, since

he (Paul) was a Roman citizen. Amazingly, the commander became

flustered, not knowing what to do.

Paul was released and given his ‘‘day in court.’’ Addressing the

Sanhedrin, he followed the cardinal rule of good presentations: He es-

tablished eye contact. ‘‘Paul looked straight at the Sanhedrin and said,

‘My brothers, I have fulfilled my duty to God in all good conscience to

this day.’ ’’ (Tony Burns, CEO of Ryder Systems, says, ‘‘You look

someone in the eyes. You can tell by the look in his eyes or the inflec-

tion in his voice what the real problem or question or answer is.’’)14

And because Paul knew his audience, he also knew how to divide

them. ‘‘My brothers, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee. I stand on

trial because of my hope in the resurrection of the dead.’’ The Saddu-

cees did not believe in resurrection, spirits, or angels, but the Pharisees did. Paul created such an argument between these two sides of the court

that his case was transferred to the court in Rome, where he was tried

in a succession of courts, each time defending himself eloquently and

successfully. Using his great communications skills in each court, he

even tried to convert his captors to Christianity! Everywhere Paul went,

he unflinchingly communicated his message.

REPETITION

The Bible and the heroes who speak its words are notoriously repeti-

tious. Artless repetition is boring, uninspiring, and ineffective. Ideas repeated in different ways and words, at just the right intervals, constitute

100

THE BIBLE ON LEADERSHIP

effective communication. This is particularly true if the ideas are new

or if they represent a new paradigm that the audience finds difficult to

understand or that represents radical change.

Paul, who truly represented a new and ‘‘foreign’’ paradigm (Chris-

tianity), addressed the synagogue in Thessalonica not just for a brief

‘‘guest sermon’’ but for three successive Sabbath days. Even though he

made some converts, many who heard him stuck with their old beliefs.

He needed to repeat his message many more times and in many differ-

ent ways before he would recruit large numbers of converts.

Modern business leaders, particularly those who are also introducing

or explaining new paradigms, also need to use the technique of repeti-

tion. Writing in Fast Company, Tom Peters observed:

Leadership takes an almost bottomless supply of verbal energy: working

the phones, staying focused on your message, repeating the same mantra

until you can’t stand the sound of your own voice—and then repeating it some more, because just when you start to become bored witless with the message, it’s probably starting to seep into the organization. 15

We do not know whether leaders like Jan Carlzon of Scandinavian

Airlines and Percy Barnevik of Asa Boveri Brown ever became ‘‘bored’’

with their message. Certainly we know they had to repeat it many times

in many forums; if they did not become bored that is a testimony to the

strength of their dedication and vision.

Although the Bible is highly repetitious, and the leaders in it had to

repeat themselves frequently, a search for the words bored or boredom in the Concordance of most Bibles yields few or no references. Paul’s

instructions to his young subordinate Timothy show large amounts of

perseverance and no presence of ennui: ‘‘I give you this charge: Preach

the word; be prepared in season and out of season; correct, rebuke,

and encourage—with great patience and careful instruction.’’ (2 Tim.

4:2–3)

The inspired leaders, biblical or modern, find repetition an indispens-

able communication tool, and may even come to find this repetition

part of their inspiration, because it fuels progress toward the targeted

Communication

101

goal. And exaggeration, as long as it is not overdone, frequently works

well in tandem with repetition. Jack Welch of General Electric ob-

served:

In leadership, you’ve got to exaggerate every statement you make.

You’ve got to repeat it a thousand times and exaggerate it. So I’ll say things like, ‘‘No one can get promoted if they’re not a Green Belt in Six Sigma.’’ Such statements are needed to move a large organization. And

then you must back them up with personnel moves to show people you’re

serious. 16

LISTENING SKILLS

Will the led truly listen and respond to the exhortations of the leaders,

even when these seem unrealistic, daunting, and/or repetitive? The an-

swer to this partly depends on the answer to another question: How

well is the leader listening to the followers? Does the leader want to

hear only good news, brushing off or ignoring attempts to point out

tacks in the road (or scorpions in the desert)? Or is the leader truly

willing to listen to constructive criticism or ways that the operation can

be improved? When the followers look at the leader, do they see a pair

of ears in front of them, or only a large, ever-moving mouth?

The Bible is full of leaders who failed to listen. Lot’s wife didn’t listen to the warning not to look back at the burning cities of Sodom and

Gomorrah, and wound up as a pillar of salt. Pharaoh did not listen to

Moses, not even after his nation was hit with ten catastrophic plagues.

Noah, on the other hand, was a man who saw and understood the

value of listening. Seeing the corrupt state of the world around him, he

had no reason to doubt that God (‘‘top management’’) was about to

destroy it by flood and start over. As someone who had never built a

boat, he was ready to listen and comply when God gave him the exact

measurements (450 feet long, 75 feet wide, and 45 feet high). He even

listened when God told him that he could fit his entire extended family

102

THE BIBLE ON LEADERSHIP

on this ark, along with two of every type of animal on the face of the

earth.

A modern example of someone with exceptional listening skills is J.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57

Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *