Code of the Lifemaker By James P. Hogan

ridicules the whole UFO phenomenon and doesn’t mince any words about it.” He sat

back and showed his palms imploringly. “Why go out of your way to upset lots of

people who don’t care about Koming and aren’t interested in any religion, but

who tend to be enthusiastic about the space program? NASO has some strong

supporters among UFO buffs. Why antagonize them?”

“I’m in the science business, not the business of making myself popular by

propping up popular myths,” Conlon replied. “That means looking for explanations

of facts. In that area there aren’t any facts that need explaining. Period.”

Brady looked across the desk in surprise. He wasn’t a scientist, but he thought

he did a pretty good job of keeping abreast by reading the popular literature.

Something was going on in the skies that scientists couldn’t account for,

surely. And, Senator Koming’s demands aside, Brady rather liked the idea of

NASO’s committing some serious effort to investigating the subject. It would be

an exciting activity to be associated with and something interesting to tell his

friends about. “But there has to be something out there,” he objected. “I mean,

I know ninety-five percent, or whatever, of what’s reported is rubbish, but what

about the other five? How can you explain that?”

Conlon snorted and massaged his forehead. How many times had he heard this

before? “I can’t, and neither can anyone else,” he replied. “That’s why they’re

what they call unidentified. That’s what the word means. It’s no more mysterious

than car accidents. If you analyze the statistics, you’ll find that some percent

are due to drunks, some to carelessness, some to vehicle defects, and so on

until you end up with five percent that nobody can pin down to any specific

cause, and nobody ever will. The causes are unidentified—but that’s no reason to

say they have anything to do with aliens. It’s the same with UFOs.”

“That doesn’t prove they don’t have something to do with aliens though,” Brady

pointed out.

“I never said it did,” Conlon replied. “I can’t prove Santa Claus doesn’t exist

either. You can’t prove a negative. Philosophically it’s impossible.”

“So, what are you saying?” Brady asked him.

Conlon tossed his hands up and shrugged. “I told you, I’m a scientist. Science

doesn’t have anything to say about it. It’s not a scientific matter.”

“How can you say that, Walt?” Brady sounded incredulous. “It’s connected with

space and spacecraft, alien life . . . How can you say it’s not scientific?”

“The way a theory is constructed logically is what makes it scientific. Not its

content. To be scientific, one of the conditions a theory has to meet is that it

must be falsifiable—there must be some way you can test it to see if it’s wrong.

You can never prove, absolutely, that any theory is right. If you’ve got a

theory that says Some UFOs might be alien spacecraft, then I agree with you—some

might. There’s no way I could prove it false. That’s all I could say, and that’s

all science says. It isn’t a falsifiable theory. See what I mean?”

Brady was shaking his head reluctantly. “I can’t buy that. There has to be some

way for science to evaluate the subject, some way to test some part of it at

least.”

“There is. You invert the logic and put forward the theory that I do:

No UFOs are alien spacecraft. Now, that theory can be falsified conclusively and

very simply, but not by anything that’s been offered as evidence so far.”

“But what about the astronomers who’ve endorsed it publicly?” Brady persisted.

“What astronomers?”

“Oh, I can’t recall their names offhand, but the ones you read about.”

“Pah!” Conlon pulled a face. “You mean people like Jannitsky?”

“Well, he’s one, yes.”

“He used to be a scientist—shut up in a lab all day with nobody ever having

heard of him. Now he’s a celebrity. Some people will do anything for

recognition. How many more like him can you find? You can count ’em on one hand,

and in a country this size that’s the least you’d expect. It doesn’t mean a damn

thing, Al. Less than two percent of professional American astronomers consider

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178

Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *