Heinlein, Robert A – To Sail Beyond the Sunset

for people of importance. They were idolised and treated as leaders; their opinions

were sought on everything and they took themselves just as seriously – after all, if

an athlete is paid a million or more a year, he knows he is important… so his

opinions on foreign affairs and domestic policies must be important, too, even

though he proves himself to be both ignorant and subliterate every time he opens his

mouth. (Most of his fans were just as ignorant and unlettered; the disease was

spreading.)

Consider these:

1) ‘Bread and Circuses’;

2) The abolition of the pauper’s oath in Franklin Roosevelt’s first term;

3)’Peer group’ promotion in public schools.

These three conditions heterodyne each other. The abolition of the pauper’s oath as

a condition for public charity ensured that habitual failures, incompetents of every

sort, people who can’t support themselves and people who won’t, each of these would

have the same voice in ruling the country, in assessing taxes and spending them, as

(for example) Thomas Edison or Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Carnegie or Andrew Jackson.

Peer group promotion ensured that the franchise would be exercised by ignorant

incompetents. And ‘Bread and Circuses’ is what invariably happens to a democracy

that goes that route: unlimited spending on `social’ programmes ends in national

bankruptcy, which historically is always followed by dictatorship.

It seemed to me that these three things were the key mistakes that destroyed the

best culture in all known histories up to that time. Oh, there were other things –

strikes by public servants, for example. My father was still alive when this became

a problem.

Father said grimly, ‘There is a ready solution for anyone on the public payroll who

feels that he is not paid enough: he can resign and work for a living. This applies

with equal force to Congressmen, Welfare “dients”, schoolteachers, generals, garbage

collectors, and judges.’

And of course the entire twentieth century from 1917 on was clouded by the

malevolent silliness of Marxism.

But the Marxists would not and could not have had much influence if the American

people had not started losing the hard common sense that had won them a continent.

By de sixties everyone talked about his ‘rights’ and no one spoke of his duties –

and patriotism was a subject for jokes.

I do not believe that either Marx or that cracker revivalist who became the First

Prophet could have damaged the country if the people had not become soft in the

head.

‘But every man is entitled to his own opinion!’

Perhaps. Certainly every man had his own opinion on everything, no matter how silly.

On two subjects the overwhelming majority of people regarded their own opinions as

Absolute Truth, and sincerely believed that anyone who disagreed with them was

immoral, outrageous, sinful, sacrilegious, offensive, intolerable, stupid,

Page 234

Heinlein, Robert A – To Sail Beyond the Sunset.txt

illogical, treasonable, actionable, against the public interest, ridiculous, and

obscene.

The two subjects were (of course) sex and religion.

On sex and religion each American citizen knew the One Right Answer, by direct

Revelation from God.

In view of the wide diversity of opinion, most of them must necessarily have been

mistaken. But on these two subjects they were not accessible to reason.

‘But you must respect another man’s religious beliefs!’ For Heaven’s sake, why?

Stupid is stupid – faith doesn’t make it smart.

I recall one candidates promise that I heard during the Presidential campaign of

1976, a campaign promise that seems to me to illustrate how far American rationality

had skidded.

‘We shall drive ever forward along this line until all our citizens have

above-average incomes!’

Nobody laughed.

When I moved to Albuquerque I simplified my life in several ways. I simplified my

holdings and split them among three conservative managements, in New York, in

Toronto, and in Zurich. I wrote a new will, listing a few sentimental bequests, but

leaving the major portion, over ninety-five per cent, to the Howard Foundation.

Why? The decision resulted from some long, long midnight thoughts. I had far more

money than one old woman could spend – Lawsy me, I could not even spend the income

from it. Leave it m my children? They were no longer children and not one of them

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230

Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *